China blames growing social unrest on anger over pollution
. Dirty water and air kill 500,000 a year, says report
· Environment chief points finger at corrupt officials
Jonathan Watts in Beijing
Friday July 6, 2007
The Guardian
The head of China’s environmental agency has blamed the rising number of riots, demonstrations and petitions across the country on public anger at pollution.
Echoing the language of the Cultural Revolution, Zhou Shengxian called for a “struggle” against polluters, and said the public refused to accept the increasing degradation of the environment.
His unusually outspoken comments underscore the frustration of state mandarins at local government officials who ignore environmental standards in order to attract investment, jobs and bribes.
Breakneck growth has turned China into a huge environmental disaster area. A soon-to-be-published World Bank report says some 500,000 people die each year as a result of pollution.
Beijing is trying to shift the economy on to a more sustainable development track. The state council - China’s cabinet - tightened the water pollution law to require more testing, licensing and stiffer penalties, the state-run Xinhua news agency reported yesterday.
But factory owners who violate state guidelines are often protected by local officials. According to Mr Zhou, the state environmental protection administration chief, many plants build secret pipes to discharge polluting chemicals. Others release toxins when locals are asleep.
The China Daily quoted him as saying: “Some businesses don’t rest deep in the night when they have no scruples about dumping pollution in rivers.”
In a recent inspection of 529 firms along the Yellow, Yangtze and other major rivers and lakes, 44% had violated environmental laws, while almost half of the 75 waste water treatment facilities underperformed or did not work. Mr Zhou said some waterways resembled “sticky glue”.
The absence of protection has stirred up discontent, he said, and prompted a growing number of “mass incidents”, the term used to describe protests. He said petitions received by his agency this year were up 8%. While not endorsing protests, Mr Zhou called for local environmental officials to stand up to violators.
Demonstrations against power and chemical plants have become increasingly common in recent years. In May, thousands took to the streets of Xiamen, in Fujian province, leading to the suspension of a petrochemical plant. In 2005, police killed at least three villagers in Dongzhou, Guangdong province, while quelling a riot over a planned power plant.
Anger has been fuelled by unfair land grabs and health fears. According to the government, two-thirds of China’s 595 cities now have unhealthy air.
Pollution scandals are common. Earlier yesterday, state media reported that tap water had been restored to 200,000 residents of Shuyang county in Jiangsu after a chemical spill halted supplies for 40 hours. The environment agency said more than a quarter of the seven main river systems were so polluted that the water was unfit for human contact.
The tendency towards secrecy has increased concerns. According to the FT, officials have tried to remove figures from a World Bank report that suggest up to 400,000 people in China die each year from outdoor air pollution, 30,000 from indoor air pollution, and 60,000 from water pollution. The government denies it has tried to interfere.
Made in China: tainted food, fake drugs and dodgy paint
World’s biggest exporter faces a global crisis of confidence as scandals grow over the quality of many of its goods
Jonathan Watts in Beijing
Thursday July 5, 2007
The Guardian
China is facing a global crisis of consumer confidence as the country’s food safety watchdog acknowledged this week that almost a fifth of the domestic products it inspects fail to reach minimum standards. Following a number of contamination scandals in the US, the world’s biggest exporter is struggling to prove that it can match quality with quantity.
In the first half of 2007, 19.1% of products made for domestic consumption were found to be substandard, the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine said in a statement on Tuesday. Among products made by small firms, the failure rate was nearly 30%.
“These are not isolated cases,” Han Yi, director of the administration’s quality control and inspection department, told the state media. Underlining his concerns, officials said hundreds of bottles of fake human blood protein were found in hospitals and excessive amounts of additives and preservatives were detected in children’s snacks.
The trust deficit is enormous and growing. Shi Ying, 50, a businesswoman, said she was so concerned about food safety that she found it difficult to shop. “I dare not eat farmed fish or meat because most are fed with growth pills or pumped with bad additives. I worry about vegetables in case they are tainted with pesticide. I even think twice about the water I drink because it might contain heavy metals.”
Although Ms Shi lives in Shenzhen, one of China’s most-advanced cities, she has started to grow her own vegetables, eat less meat and drink water only from respected bottled brands or the family well. When she does have to shop, she puts safety above patriotism.
“I think foreign food is less risky. Even though they are not as fresh, I trust products from the US, Europe and Japan because those countries protect their environments. Sometimes when I see foreigners blithely eating raw lettuce in Chinese restaurants, I worry for them.”
While the worst violations are in the domestic market, the repercussions are felt beyond the country’s borders. China fills the shelves of Wal-Mart, Tesco and Sainsbury’s with low-price products. But as its world presence has grown, so have concerns about safety.
First, there was a mysterious spate of cat and dog deaths in the US this year that was later attributed to tainted pet food from China. Next, in the US and UK, came the recall of more than 1m Thomas & Friends toy trains coated with poisonous lead paint from China. Then, independence day fireworks were withdrawn in the US because of their dangerously unpredictable sense of direction.
Most of these scandals occurred in the US, where food safety is fast becoming a front in the trade war between the world’s biggest consumer and producer.
“I think we have reached a point unfortunately where Made in China is now a warning label in the United States,” said a Democratic senator, Richard Durbin, recently. The issue also topped the agenda of recent talks between the US treasury secretary, Henry Paulson, and the Chinese vice-premier, Wu Yi.
Other countries have also expressed concern. Last year Peter Mandelson, the EU trade commissioner, said that European customs officers had seized fake birth control pills and HIV drugs from China. According to Mr Mandelson, half the counterfeit goods found in the EU originate in China.
Japan has also called for higher safety standards, and Singapore, Australia, Panama and the Dominican Republic have recalled millions of tubes of Chinese-made toothpaste that allegedly contained dangerous levels of diethylene glycol, a toxin.
It remains unclear whether this represents a surge in the number of unsafe goods or simply wider coverage at a time of rising trade friction. But the threat to China’s business is growing.
In an attempt to quell concerns, the government said yesterday it was drawing up new safety rules for oral care products. Beijing has also promised to revise its inspection system for other products. Last month, the government published its first five-year plan for improving food and drug safety. It closed 180 food factories in the first half of this year and seized tonnes of sweets, pickles, crackers and seafood tainted with formaldehyde, illegal dyes and industrial wax.
But the government also stands accused of reacting slowly to scandal rather than dealing with the root causes: a lack of trust in the safety standards of a country with a profit-first economic policy and a secretive, unaccountable political system.
Public confidence has not been helped by an official response that includes denial and scapegoating.
“I think it would be better if the media would stop playing up this issue,” a foreign ministry spokesman, Qin Gang, said this week. Last month, the former head of China’s food and drug agency, Zheng Xiaoyu, was sentenced to death for accepting 6.5m yuan (£425,000) in bribes from pharmaceutical companies to expedite the approval of new drugs.
Media reassurances are unconvincing. “More than 80% of China’s products are up to standard,” the Business Daily said yesterday. It was not meant ironically. This was a gain on the previous year.
Along with health and the environment, consumer safety has been one of the biggest victims of the rush to get rich. The domestic market has probably been affected more than international trade because export standards are higher than for goods sold in China. Last month, food inspectors said paraffin wax, dyes, formaldehyde and cancer-causing compounds were detected in food produced by unlicensed and small producers.
There have also been scandals related to fake or poorly made drugs. Last summer, 11 people were killed by antibiotics that contained diethylene glycol, an industrial toxin. In 2005, two boys in Guangdong province died from rabies after receiving bogus vaccinations. A year before, at least 50 babies in Anhui province died and more than 100 were malnourished after being fed fake milk formula, some of which had only 6% of the vitamins, minerals and protein needed for a growing infant.
Toxic toys’ spark recall
August 03, 2007
US toys giant Fisher-Price has announced a global recall of nearly one million toys made in China – including the popular Big Bird, Elmo, Dora and Diego characters – due to fears they could be coloured with toxic lead-based paints.
The toymaker said it was recalling 83 types of toys, covering 967,000 individual items.
The full list of toys being recalled
“Paint on some of these products could contain lead in excess of permissible levels,” the company stressed in an announcement.
Fisher-Price, a subsidiary of Mattel Inc, said the items were produced by a single contract manufacturer in China but did not give the company’s name or location.
“We apologise to everyone affected by this recall, especially those who bought the toys in question,” Mattel chairman Robert A. Eckert said in a statement.
“We realise that parents trust us with what is most precious to them – their children.
“And we also recognise that trust is earned. Our goal is to correct this problem, improve our systems and maintain the trust of the families that have allowed us to be part of their lives by acting responsibly and quickly to address their concerns.”
Fisher-Price is today expected to make an announcement on the Australian recall.
All affected toys are marked Fisher-Price, and carry a date code between 109-7LF and 187-7LF.
Consumers with the recalled products should contact Mattel to arrange for a fully refunded return.
Reader Comments (1)
How many years and months did it take for the public and the consumers organisations to badger the governments to get manufacturers to print information on the tins, bottles and packets of food products, so we, the broad public, could make an informed decision about its contents — this is especially vital to mothers with children, who want to get the best their money can buy.
After a lot of screaming and kicking, we finally got it, and we now should be most grateful for the openness and truthful information printed by the manufacturers — right?
Except for one small thing! We are now informed by the press about the careless methods of food of all kind, how Ws produced and mixed in many countries, especially China.
Personally I have nothing against the people from and in China, or anywhere else, many has been my very good friends, but I don’t want to be sick or worse, because of their lack of hygiene ml their food factories.
So when we read the information on the containers these days, and it clearly states: Made from Australian and imported ingredient.
Imported from where?
And what are the proportions, 10 per cent Australian and 90 per cent imports and from where?
Perhaps it’s the other way around, 90 per cent Australian and 10 per cent?
Who would know - you?
I am suspicious, the labels are not very clear and I would like to stay healthy for some time yet.
Can anybody help me?