'Prosecute' call on failed Paradise Dam
Sunday, March 2, 2008 at 10:59AM
stevem in Environmental Impact Statement, Paradise Dam, Peter Garrett


Gympie%20Times%20Banner-small.jpg 

 

I MAR 2008 

Minister repeats false claims of success on Burnett

Story: Arthur Gorrie

QUEENSLAND Water Infrastructure offi­cials should be prosecuted, not protected, over their failures to meet environmental requirements attached to Commonwealth approval for the Paradise Dam, Save the Mary River Group secretary David Kreutz said yesterday.

Mr Kreutz said it was ridiculous a State Government that wanted to dam the Mary River should be in charge of auditing its past performance and should then appoint its dam construction company to conduct the audit.

“When you get audited by the Taxation Department, they don’t just ask you if everything’s OK and then let you check your own figures.

“That’s not what an audit is,” he said.

“The Environment Protection and Biodi­versity Conservation Act is still a law and the Paradise Dam’s so-called ‘partial com­pliance’ is not compliance, it is non-com­pliance in all but the best of circumstanc­es.

“When you get a speeding ticket, do they ask you if you were speeding and then accept it if you say no?

“When you break the law, you get prose­cuted.

“The same should go for government or neo-government officials who break laws like the EPBC Act,” he said.

Mr Kreutz said the Federal Government did not yet appear to have released the full environmental audit report on the Para­dise Dam, a crucial part of any approval or rejection of the Traveston Crossing dam by Environment Minister Peter Garrett.

Even the one-page summary, which had been released, made it clear the Paradise Dam’s fishway was not working. Its suc­cess was a critical condition of the original Commonwealth approval for the Burnett River dam.

Water Minister Craig Wallace this week trumpeted the claimed environmental success of the dam, claiming it was “prov­ing its critics wrong”.

Even with its fishway still inoperable, the Minister claimed the dam had been “unfairly attacked” in the worst drought on record and had “a good environmental record”.

“Paradise Dam is now making the critics drink their words,” he said.

“It is now well placed to fuel strong growth in the region by providing much needed water to farms and industry.”

He repeated his incorrect claim last week that the dam had been cleared by his department’s audit of its environmental performance.

“The dam is now at 45.6 per cent capac­ity,” he said, up from the 4 per cent he claimed last week, but still substantially less than the 57 per cent he said was the approximate minimum at which the fish-way would work.

And despite an audit summary that de­scribed the dam as “only partially com­pliant” and indicated the only organisa­tion claiming this was good enough was the dam’s management body, Burnett Wa­ter Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of the State Go­vernment’s bulk water resource body, Sunwater, itself a division of Mr Wallace’s department.

He said he had been “advised by Sunwa­ter that a recent Commonwealth Government audit of Paradise Dam had con­firmed the dam is complying with the EPBC Act”. As reported in The Gympie Times last week, the audit report actually records the dam’s failure to achieve full compliance on the lungfish, specifically listed as vulnerable under the Act, and qu­otes the operating authority saying the fishway was an imperfect compromise.

Update on Sunday, March 2, 2008 at 11:34AM by Registered Commenterstevem

Gympie%20Times%20Banner-small.jpg

 

 

Our View - 1 MAR 2008

Nev McHaig

It appears the State Government has two sets of standards it comes to dealing with different areas of Queensland.

Almost two years Since Premier Peter Beattie flew into Gympie, announced he is going to dam the Mary River and flew out. After the impact sunk in the questions began to fly as to just how much prior planning had gone into this dam proposal and why there had been no consultation.

It soon became apparent Mr Beattie and his then deputy, now Premier Anna Bligh, had along with colleagues made a decision, based on a few pages of a desk top study as a knee–jerk reaction to a looming water crisis in Brisbane.

It is a crisis that still exists, but now seems of little consequence to some as storages ap­proach 40 per cent and the city’s population cries out for relaxation of rationing measures.

This week it was divulged the Government was planning to dam Baffle Creek to supply Gladstone with water.

However, the Government has been quick to refute the claims, saying such a decision would take years to reach because of all the studies and consultation that would be need­ed. This smacks very much of double stan­dards.

Two studies are underway, one on the envi­ronmental health of the rivers in the water ba­sin and what water can be taken for other purposes, the second is a 50 year water supply study of potential sources of water to meet these needs.

In the case of the Mary neither of these stu­dies was done prior to the Government’s announcement.

The Government has now discovered re­gional water supply planning also involves looking at all options for future water supplies for a region including desalination, ground­-water, dams, water recycling as well as de­mand management.

Why did these criteria not apply in the case of the Mary Valley?

Article originally appeared on Swamp News (http://swampnews.squarespace.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.