« This is an open letter to the Governor of Queensland. | Main | Water recycling plan switched off »

Fish kill should end Traveston dam

 

28th June 2009
By Damian Bathersby

Several lungfish lie dead below the North Pine Dam, south of Brisbane. Photo: Contributed

A leading Sunshine Coast environmentalist has accused the state government of deliberately downplaying last week’s lungfish kill at North Pine Dam which, he believes, should spell the end of the Traveston Crossing Dam proposal.

President of the Conondale Range Committee, Ian Mackay, claimed SEQWater had both under reported the number of lungfish killed and over exaggerated the success of its “rescue operation” to return the relatively few survivors to the water.

“This couldn’t have come at a worse time for the state government, with the Traveston Dam proposal now well overdue in being passed up to federal environment minister Peter Garret for approval,” Mr Mackay said.

“There’s no way you can mitigate against this sort of catastrophe.”

“When a dam overflows, or water needs to be quickly released, a lot of aquatic species, particularly fish and turtles go over the top and only a few survive the torrential pummelling.

“This is no waterslide experience. It’s a deadly malestrom. Some of the dead lungfish at North Pine were found wedged in trees.”

Ever since Traveston Dam had been proposed, premiers and government ministers had boasted about how many times it would have overtopped if it had already been built, he said.

The proposed dam had been downsized by splitting it into two stages in what he described as a “transparent effort” to lever it past the federal approval process.

“What that means is that you have a much smaller dam with exactly the same catchment as before, you’re bound to get more filling and overtopping, especially in wet years like this one.

“It’s like putting a small bowl to catch a torrential flow from a stormwater pipe.

“It’ll fill quite easily, won’t hold all that much water and will regularly overflow.

“In this last week we’ve had brought home to us that every overflow will act as a fish and turtle cull.”

Mr Mackay called on federal environment minister Peter Garrett to instigate a full investigation into the extent of the North Pine lungfish kill as well as the alleged efforts to downplay it.

“This dreadful event should be the nail in the coffin for the Traveston Dam proposal,” he said.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (2)

I think it is really important to stress that no-one associated with SaveTheMaryRiver is critical of the local volunteers who have assisted SEQWater in relocating the survivors and cleaning up the carcases in the last three lungfish kills at North Pine. These people are doing the job that State Government officers should be doing and they should be thoroughly commended for their important efforts.

The problem lays in the fact that we have a state, federal and internationally protected species being killed by a state-owned water corporation operating a dam. If any other individual was caught killing even a single lungfish, they would be subject to extreme penalties under the law.

This is at a time when the scientific understanding of the species is of critical importance to managing existing and proposed new state government water infrastructure projects on every river in the world where this unique species exists. It would be reasonable to assume that these fish kill events should be the subject of intense scientific study, in an attempt at working out how to avoid them happening in future.

Instead, what seems to be happening is government media spin and quick clean-up operations only, reliant on the efforts of local volunteers. SEQWater are required by their licence conditions to conduct a full investigation of any fish kill incidents at their dams, and EPA has a similar responsibility to conduct a scientific investigation of any such major kill events. One can only hope that the media spotlight that was focussed on the most recent kill has been enough to shame the state government into conducting a proper scientific investigation that accurately documents the event, (and any future ones), and that this information is used to improve the management of of our rivers and threatened species in the future.

If not, the extinction of the Australian lungfish will be just another sick jewel in the crown worn by Australia as the society responsible for the greatest rate of species extinction on the planet today. To put this particular ancestral species in evolutionary perspective, this would be a far more scientifically tragic event than the loss of the last great whale, or the death of the last koala.
June 28, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSteve B
Hi all,
If you've been watching the news lately, you may have been shocked to see the items about endangered Lungfish being swept to their death over a dam spillway in South-East Queensland, following a planned water release.

Like many, you may have been saddened by the news, yet unsure of what you could do about it. The online letter generator at http://www.stoppress.com.au offers a solution. Visit the site to send letters to Kate Jones (Qld Labor Minister for Climate Change & Sustainability) and Peter Garrett (Federal Environment Minister). These letters request a thorough investigation of the recent fishkill, and urge development of mitigation measures to avoid future carnage of this sort.

It is a tragic event for a rare and ancient species like the lungfish and is an event that should never be foisted on the Mary River, with its significant lungfish and unique turtle populations, by the construction of the proposed Traveston Crossing Dam.
June 28, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterArkin Mackay

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.