« Research into trends in streamflow in the Mary | Main | Public consultation' component of the State Environmental Impact Study. »

Who is behind the Traveston Dam Project?

Posted on Friday, December 8, 2006 at 02:47PM by Registered CommenterSteveB in | Comments Off

 Traveston Swamp News_LOGO.jpgWheezer_small.jpg

A lot of attention has focussed on the Premier’s role in this dam proposal, but there are a number of other powerful people in government and industry pushing for it, or working hard to ‘farce track’ it.

I suggest that as you find out more information about the individuals behind the proposal, their interconnections and business interests, you attach them to this thread, in the interests of public information.

I will get the ball rolling with a short bio of  ROSS ROLFE - who is in the role of chief headkicker for making sure the project goes through without any impediments.

Ross Rolfe was recently reappointed Coordinator-General of Queensland. Previously he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Stanwell Corporation, one of the largest electricity generators. Before joining Stanwell, Ross was Director-General and Coordinator-General of the Department of State Development (August 1998 to December 2001) and, prior to that, was Director-General of the Department of  Environment and Heritage. He has been Chair of QMI Solutions, Member of the Institute of Molecular Bioscience, a Director of Queensland Resources Council, Tennis Queensland, and Queensland Centre for Clean Energy as well as a broad range of other Board positions in the Energy, Resource and Environmental sectors.

The Coordinator-General is responsible for:
• facilitating private sector investment in major resource projects
• coordinating the provision of project specific infrastructure
• coordinating the provision of State infrastructure to support export industries
• planning the long term requirements for economic infrastructure
• promoting public and private investment in infrastructure to protect Queensland’s competitive advantage
• coordinating the activities of Government agencies delivering major State projects

I suggest we find similar biographies for all the other major players, like Graham Newton, Bob McCarthy, Bernard Burke, Kerry Shine, Anna Bligh, Gerard Bradley, Richard Parris, John Gralton, Thomas Fenwick, Peter Arniston.
The members of the Queensland Water Commission are also worthy of scrutiny. Elizabeth Nosworthy, Jamie Quinn, David Green, John Bradley. .www.qwc.qld.gov.au/about_us.html

Here is a link to another post on the subject of QWIPL and it’s directors.: CSIRO ECOS Article

Several of these people are members of the Brisbane Institute, which sometimes has good biographies on its members and transcripts of talks they have given. www.brisinst.org.au

The government is following nearly the same pathway with its ‘farce tracking’ of the Mary River Dam as it did on Paradise. Queensland Water Infrastructure Pty Ltd seems to be a company very much in the same mould (deliberate misspellin) as Burnett Water.

They share the same CEO - Graham Newton.
BWPL had one shareholder (Tom Barton - who recently opened paradise).
QWIPL has one 1$ shareholder - Bernard Burke(Department of State Development)
Here are the other directors of QWIPL.
Bob McCarthy (DG NRRM&W)
Gerard Bradley (Under Treasurer and Under Secretary of Queensland.)
Richard Parris
John Gralton
Thomas Fenwick

Almost everyone on this forum would know by know that Scott Smith- the man who laid the groundwork for the dam proposal from within NRM&W is now employed QWIPL.

Look them up, do as much research on them as you can, post what you find out about them on this forum so we can build up a picture of who we are dealing with. Why not write to them (respectfully) and let them know the public has a huge interest in QWIPLs business?

In my opinion QWIPL is set up as a company simply to artificially distance the State Government from public scrutiny during the legal processes that need to occur for the various licences and approvals needed under State and Federal law to build the dam. QWIPL applies to the various State Government bodies for licencing and approval, and undertakes commercial contracts with State Government entities to perform work for them (for example, mapping and hydrological studies) All these activities are now commercial transactions and very difficult for the public to scrutinize.

Here is another question - if you were a government officer in any of the departments assessing QWIPL’s activities - would the fact that your departmental head was a director of the company that you were assessing influence your work?

Legally speaking there would be no conflict of interest (between directors and shareholder) in QWIPL’s activities under company law. However, it is obvious that ethically there is a huge conflict of public interest in QWIPLs activities.

The biggest smoke and mirrors trick that QWIPL will be used for is the application of the project for assessment under the federal EPBC act. QWIPL will be the proponent, and there is a loophole in the act (section 87a) which allows the federal environment minister to refer the assessment of the project to “an accredited process”, rather than setting up an assessment process himself. The Queensland Government has “an accredited process” - the same one that was used to assess Paradise Dam. This would result in the Queensland Department of Public Works assessing the EPBC implications of QWIPL proposal on behalf of the Federal Government. THIS MUST NOT OCCUR!

If you want to research further - here is the link to the Co-ordinator generals report of how BWIPL dodged through its environmental assessments on the Burnett - they are so proud of it that they published it!

Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Burnett River Dam.pdf

Also - here is the link to the EPBC documents for Paradise Dam, and the site that we have to watch very closely for details of the Mary River Dam:
  Burnett Water Pty Ltd

You can bet that the Government will not put out a press release announcing the referral - they will try to slip things through quietly - just like they did the WRP legislation for the Mary.

See also article: Dam Deception!

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version